07 September 2010

Can Legal Action Reverse The Rise In Container Shipping Rates?  

New Case Throws Up Possibilities

backlink: back
email
printlink: print this news article
news archivelink: news archive
Shipping News Feature

UK – DENMARK – FAR EAST – Just last week we pointed out the irony of air cargo carriers and air freight forwarders being embroiled in anti trust suits right across the world whilst container shipping lines, immune to such legislation, continued to boost rates. This after a terribly bleak period of falling traffic levels and attempts to staunch the flow of blood with shrinking tariffs, especially to high volume, long term contract customers.

Now it seems that the policy of raising rates accepted meekly or otherwise by clients, may have a sting in the tail in a case which may prove decisive. In the two opponents we have two of the very largest players in their own markets. On one side AP Moller Maersk, owners of Maersk Line, the largest container shipping line in the world, on the other Argos, the UK retail chain and part of the giant Home Retail Group Empire.

The case against Maersk is simple, Argos maintain that the freight rates they agreed to import their goods from the Far East for the next two years were a fixed and invariable contract with a price of $930 per 40 foot box covering the movement of 5,000 containers in the period. The rate then quoted by Maersk rose threefold to $2730 per container, a jump to cause the most hardened and sceptical freight professional a double take. Maersk no doubt will hold that the price was not guaranteed, just as presumably they will claim Argos didn’t guarantee to use all 5,000 boxes.

Trouble is we don’t know what either of them will actually say as so far both organisations have declined to comment on the matter. What we do know is that many people will be watching the case with great interest. According to Court documents Argos replaced the agreement after they say Maersk reneged, and took out a fixed price space protection with an alternative carrier, namely Kuehne and Nagel. This replacement contract they say will cost them an excess payment of almost $14 million, money they want back from Maersk.

As anyone in the trade will know those boxes won’t be on any ships bearing the Kuehne and Nagel flag proudly on her funnel, the most likely company to move the bulk of these orders will of course be – Maersk Line. The point to watch is of course who blinks first, if the case goes to Court look forward to a long and bitter battle, the decision will hinge on precisely the terms written into any contract and whether the Court accepts any get out clauses no doubt forming part of the agreement.

So Argos and Maersk fall out, K and N pick up the baton, slip it to Maersk in exchange for the inflated rate which they admit privately they have accepted meekly in the past, passing on the rate (presumably plus a profit) to Argos. This should be one to watch.

Bookmark and Share
To comment on this Story, click here
Got something to say?

We welcome any comments to this story, to be posted after a website editor's review.
Please stay on topic, provide credible information or insight that moves the discussion forward, be convincing and try to be brief. Please note you are giving us licence to amend or edit any comments.
Aliases are acceptable but comments may be taken more seriously if real names are used.

Name *
* = required field
Email * (will not be published)
Comment *
 

keep up to date with the
latest shipping news...
get the inside track
check out the blog...
check out the latest
industry events

Advertise with Handy Shipping Guide